They don’t get rid of the I 960 requirement entirely, but are picking away at this law that voters approved to force them to get a 2/3 vote before allowing a tax increase.
The Washington Policy Center sends this out this afternoon:
The Senate has voted to “temporarily” suspend the 2/3 vote requirements for tax increases enacted multiple times by voters. The vote was 26 to 23.Instead of approving the bill as referred by the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the full Senate adopted an amendment that limited its changes to only the 2/3 vote restriction. This means the current requirement for non-binding advisory votes for tax increases not sent first to the voters for approval would remain in effect.Based on the number of tax increase proposals being considered by the Legislature, it could be a long ballot for voters in November.Next up for the proposal is debate in the House.
| Yeas: 26 Nays: 23 Absent: 0 Excused: 0 |
BAD GUYS:
Voting Yea: Senators Berkey, Brown, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gordon, Hargrove, Hatfield, Haugen, Jacobsen, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, McDermott, Murray, Oemig, Prentice, Pridemore, Ranker, Regala, Rockefeller, Shin, and Tom
Voting Yea: Senators Berkey, Brown, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gordon, Hargrove, Hatfield, Haugen, Jacobsen, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, McDermott, Murray, Oemig, Prentice, Pridemore, Ranker, Regala, Rockefeller, Shin, and Tom
GOOD GUYS:
Voting Nay: Senators Becker, Benton, Brandland, Carrell, Delvin, Hewitt, Hobbs, Holmquist, Honeyford, Kauffman, Kilmer, King, Marr, McCaslin, Morton, Parlette, Pflug, Roach, Schoesler, Sheldon, Stevens, Swecker, and Zarelli
Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://www.victoriataft.com
