Pete the Banker: Obama Cooks Up Another Mortgage Catastrophe

February 24, 2012

SHARE
President Obama is allowing what happened to Fannie and Freddie during the mortgage meltdown to happen again with the FHA.  The President has said he wouldn’t return to the same old failed policies that got us into the current housing depression. He even made a point of it in his State of Union address,
“But I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place.”    
But he’s making it worse. The Federal Housing Administration continues to operate as if the financial crisis had never occurred.  A prior piece on this blog (here) disclosed FHA’s policy of requiring only 5% down payment on new loans.  
Given this pre-crisis mentality, the mass media is increasingly asking  “Is FHA  the next Fannie Freddie?’ See here, and here.

The FHA is bleeding capital. The patient is bleeding and no one in the federal government is bothering to apply first aid. In fact, the Obama Administration has opened the wound even further.  Incapital surplus has shown continuous decline.  

“But the FHA is in trouble as well because of the surging defaults. The capital ratio of the agency’s mutual mortgage insurance fund slipped to 0.24% last year, well below the 2% mandated by Congress.”   

FHA’s liquid assets last year were $33.7 billion. Outstanding mortgage guarantee obligations totaled $1 T in insured mortgages resulting in a leverage ratio of 30 To 1 by HUD’s own numbers.  The AEI incorporating FHA’s $1.2B economic net worth computed a 1000 to 1 leverage ratio. 
 
This is far above that experienced by FannieMae at the height of the financial crisis when its leverage ratio was 20 to 1. 

Low FHA down payment requirements coupled with housing prices which remain in a historic decline(Core Logic 4.7%, YOY Dec 2011) spawn the likelihood that increasing future FHA default rates which will place greater pressure on depleted FHA’s reserves.  “Figures compiled by HUD confirm that delinquencies on FHA’s book of business are worsening. At year end 716,786 loans (9.73%) were deemed “seriously delinquent” (90-days or more pass due) compared to 636,778 (8.77%) at Sept. 30.” And Zillow projects another 3.9% drop in 2012.  
 
Even the $1 Billion received by FHA under the Administration’s proposed bank settlement which the press dubbed as an alleged panacea to the Agencies ills is insignificant when compared to the FHA liquid reserve and massive outstanding loan guarantee numbers cited above. 

While the financial situation of FHA becomes more tenuous in light of the suffering housing market, this Administration gives lip service to strengthening of the FHA’s capital position by charging FHA borrowers higher mortgage insurance  premiums, and then allocating those very premium increases to support tax cuts for the President and his Administrations own political purposes rather than to build the FHA’s capital position to offset higher loan risks incurred.
Loan guarantee fees were increased in December for FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by .1% explicitly dedicated to finance the Social Security payroll tax “cut”.   Subsequently FHA fees were raised again recently to sustain the extension of the tax cut through the remainder of the year.  These funds were not dedicated to building the capital reserves that back the loan guarantees of the FHA, further imperiling the agency’s future financial position. 
The FHA has demonstrated a long term declining financial position which has been aggravated by declining home prices, increasing FHA loan default rates, and mis-allocation of increased loan guarantee premiums levied on new borrowers.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were inadequately capitalized and over leveraged in 2008, a result of underpricing of loan guarantee fees and ended up in government conservatorship.  And now it is the FHA that is similarly under capitalized and over leveraged.

Where is the president’s promise to oppose past policies which created the very financial crisis he now blames on the prior Administration?   Where is the Obama Administration’s commitment to policies that insure the return to a fiscally sound housing financial system???  Why aren’t borrowers fees for loan guarantees being used to fortify the capital  reserves of those financial institutions that provide those borrowers with the highly leveraged loans in order to compensate for the higher risk of default?

It’s disingenuous Mr. President to disavow the use of former policies that you blame for creating the financial crisis, while your Administration is actively promoting them! Disingenuous and dangerous.
Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://www.victoriataft.com