From an article in Philadelphia’s The Bulletin, testimony of the Obama Campaign coordinating with ACORN and editors at the New York Times having knowledge of it, but killing last October it would have been a “a game changer.”

Quotes from the article,

“A lawyer involved with legal action against Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) told a House Judiciary subcommittee on March 19 The New York Times had killed a story in October that would have shown a close link between ACORN, Project Vote and the Obama campaign because it would have been a “a game changer.””

“During her testimony, Ms. Heidelbaugh said Ms. Moncrief had told her The New York Times articles stopped when she revealed that the Obama presidential campaign had sent its maxed-out donor list to ACORN’s Washington, D.C. office.

Ms. Moncrief told Ms. Heidelbaugh the campaign had asked her and her boss to “reach out to the maxed-out donors and solicit donations from them for Get Out the Vote efforts to be run by ACORN.””

“ACORN has issued statements claiming that Ms. Moncrief is merely a disgruntled former worker.” (naturally)

U.S. Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wisc. said,

“If true, The New York Times is showing once again that it is a not an impartial observer of the political scene. If they want to be a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party, they should put Barack Obama approves of this in their newspaper.”

Seems to me, one of the earliest actions taken by both the Bolsheviks and Nazis was to control the media, have them sympathetic to their “cause.”

Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://