Is Government Health Care Constitutional?

June 29, 2009

SHARE

Frequent Victoria Taft Show guest, former Justice Department lawyer, David Rivkin, poses this tantalizing question in an op ed piece today in the WSJ (see link to the right, below),

Is Government Health Care Constitutional?

And here’s where Rivkin and fellow author, Lee Casey, look to find guidance: the abortion decisions.

The Supreme Court created the right to privacy in the 1960s and used it to strike down a series of state and federal regulations of personal (mostly sexual) conduct. This line of cases began with Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965 (involving marital birth control), and includes the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.

The court’s underlying rationale was not abortion-specific. Rather, the justices posited a constitutionally mandated zone of personal privacy that must remain free of government regulation, except in the most exceptional circumstances. As the court explained in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), “these matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and the mystery of human life.”

And Rivkin and Casey write the Obama administration won’t be able to simply write this to be above judicial review,

…A brief review of the Supreme Court’s recent war-on-terror decisions, brought by or on behalf of detained enemy combatants, will disabuse that notion. This area of governmental authority was once nearly immune from judicial intervention. Over the past five years, however, the Supreme Court (supposedly the nonpolitical branch) has unapologetically transformed itself into a full-fledged, policy-making partner with the president and Congress.

Read the rest here.

Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://www.victoriataft.com