My story on the defeat of Brad Avakian by one of the most decent men in politics today, Dennis Richardson, is an abject lesson for all lefties who believe they’re on the side of angels.
While I’m watching the live blogs I’m bringing to you some of the more, ah, interesting reactions via Twitter.
The word “dominionist” is making a come back:
The case before #scotus today is just one chunk of a scary dominionist iceberg
— Pam Body Garf Head (@bigbigtruck) March 25, 2014
Here’s someone who never heard of Jesus:
— imfabulous (@imfabulous13) March 25, 2014
How about “secularist”? No religion in the workplace, you dominionists, you!
— CDA Women's Caucus (@CDAWomensCaucus) March 25, 2014
Here we go with humans not being in corporations again (but, just remember, humans exist in organized unions):
— WhenRightIsWrong (@Right_All_Wrong) March 25, 2014
Don’t you know if you’re an American with individual rights you can’t take them in the workplace? Sheesh!
— ChampionofDeplorable (@FJ473) March 25, 2014
Here’s a good point:
— William J. Green (@wjgreen_) March 25, 2014
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 24, 2014
The bossy girls are back:
— WV FREE (@WVFREE) March 25, 2014
— Molly M Skinner-Day (@CedarMariposita) March 25, 2014
Mocking the business they’re trying to bring down:
— Amy Lynn Smith (@alswrite) March 25, 2014
I suppose they’ll cry when they read this tweet from a guy who thinks they’re smart enough to make their own decisions:
— William J. Green (@wjgreen_) March 25, 2014
Intentionally missing the point that women were fully capable of buying their own abortions before ObamaCare:
— Kimberly Brusk (@peaceforus4ever) March 25, 2014
“The Democrats” weigh in with their attempt to obscure the point and being ironic in the process (since they backed the government getting involved in a health care in the first place):
— The Democrats (@TheDemocrats) March 25, 2014
And you’re a
racist. I mean a sexist. I mean a homophobe. No, you’re just a bigot. Must be if you’re a religious person, right?
— Tim Tracey (@timothyjtracey) March 25, 2014
And a little truth:
— Richard Viguerie (@RichardViguerie) March 25, 2014
[Since this was posted, SCOTUS has decided to take the Hobby Lobby case]
This brisk Portland morning I dragged myself into a local coffee shop to get three Americanos--stat!–and, as I was drizzling in the required milk product into the cups, overheard a gaggle of gals discussing ObamaCare. It seems the three 20-30 somethings were upset the US Supreme Court may decide today to take up cases that could exempt religious people from parts of the bill forcing them to cover abortifacent and birth control insurance coverage. The convo went something like this,
Red head, ‘Well, I mean, they can have their religious beliefs…’
Short hair (finishing her sentence), ‘I suppose…’
Too much make up, ‘But should they be able to go line by line through it to pick what they want to follow? I mean…’
These women were in support of forcing free people into a system which subordinates religious beliefs to the collective ‘good.’ It made me sad they could speak so dismissively of religious beliefs while supporting a program, ObamaCare, which drops a cluster bomb into America’s health insurance and delivery system and thus far has been a spectacular failure. Had they been paying attention, these women would have known this aspect of ObamaCare has been fought hammer and tong since somebody actually read the bill.
SCOTUS could take up one of three cases challenging ObamaCare’s birth control insurance criteria,
The three cases on which the court could act on Tuesday concern claims made by Mennonite, evangelical Christian and Roman Catholic families that run businesses.
“What’s really a focus of the case is protecting these people’s religious convictions,” said Kyle Duncan, an attorney with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which represents evangelical Christians David and Barbara Green and their children in one of the cases. They own arts and crafts retailer Hobby Lobby Stores Inc and Mardel, a chain of Christian bookstores.
A key question will be whether individual religious liberty applies to a person’s company. If stare decisis means anything, the legal theory guiding Citizen’s United campaign contribution case should prevail in this one. If it does, get ready for the howls of protest from the left.
Back at the coffee shop, it never occurred to these women they could pay for their own birth control pills for less than $10 a month instead of forcing people of faith to forsake their beliefs to accommodate others’ sex lives. I guess the old saw about about cows and milk has been changed to, ‘why should I pay for my birth control when I can force it from everyone else for free?
All day long I’ve been swabbing my house and keeping me company? Hour after hour of all the speeches from CPAC 2013. I loved Sarah Palin’s speech–“step away from the telepromptr, Mr. President and lead” –later grabbing her Big Gulp cup, Ted Cruz’s fabulous exhibition, Marco Rubio’s charged up reminder of what makes America great and Phyllis Schlafley’s tales from the front lines. But I believe the most important speech of the event is one that won’t get much play. It’s the one that is the most important because of who made the speech. It was made by an author whom I’ve tried countless times to come on my show to talk about just this thing.
The most important speech was by Eric Metaxas who spoke on religious liberty. It is one speech that as an American you cannot miss. Metaxas has especial moral authority to tell this tale because he has done deep study into the last time the world saw this loss of religious liberty–under the Nazis. He tells this tale in his book Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy.
Here is an excerpt of that speech and below is the video of his talk. Please watch it.
Okay, so where are the threats to Religious Freedom in America today? Well, for one thing, understand we are not talking about Freedom of Worship. In a speech 18 months ago, Hillary Clinton replaced the phrase Freedom of Religion with Freedom of Worship — and my hero and friend Chuck Colson noticed and was disturbed by it. Why? Because these are radically different things. They have Freedom of Worship in China. But what exactly is Freedom of Worship?
In my book Bonhoeffer I talk about a meeting between Bonhoeffer’s friend, the Rev. Martin Niemoller, who early on in the Third Reich was one of those fooled by Hitler. And in that meeting he says something to Hitler about how he, Niemoller, cares about Germany and Third Reich — and Hitler cuts him off and says “I built the Third Reich. You just worry about your sermons!”
There in a few words you have the idea of Freedom of Worship. Freedom of Worship says you can have your little strange rituals and say whatever you like in your little religious buildings for an hour or two on Sundays, but once you leave that building you will bow to the secular orthodoxy of the state! We will tell you what to think on the big and important questions. Questions like when life begins and who gets to decide when to end it and what marriage is… And if you don’t like it, tough luck! That’s Freedom of Worship and that have that in China and they had it in Germany in Bonhoeffer’s day…
But the Founding Fathers said just the opposite! They said the faith inside that church building must live on and flourish outside that building. In fact, the Founders believed the success of the American Experiment depends on it! In Os Guinness’s book — A FREE PEOPLE’S SUICIDE – he reminds us that the Founders believed Freedom of Religion was at the heart of the American Experiment.
In that book he talks about the Golden Triangle of Freedom — I’ll bet you never heard about that in school or in college. He explains that the Founders knew that Freedom and Self-Government were not possible without Virtue. Without virtue, we would simply vote to line our own pockets and elect those leaders who would line our pockets. Sound familiar? But they believed that Freedom required Virtue and Virtue in turn required Faith. It was mainly Faith that motivated citizens toward Virtue. So Freedom required Virtue and Virtue required Faith — but Faith in turn required Freedom. Faith requires Freedom. The whole triangle falls apart if you take away any of those three things. They support each other. Please read A FREE PEOPLE’S SUICIDE.