Tag Archives: don’t shoot portland

How a False Police Report Was Used by Multnomah County DA to Run Up Bail & Deprive Mike Strickland of His Liberty

On July 7, 2016, Mike Strickland, known as “Laughing at Liberals” on YouTube, was attacked by Antifa/Black Bloc anarchist/Black Lives Matter protesters at an event which billed itself as “Don’t Shoot Portland.”

In the run-up to the march and anti-gun protest, self described Black Panther organizers, including Jeelani Mutulu Haru Shareef, urged protesters to  carry guns, “run up” on cops and use guns to take out cops who might hurt protesters.

“If you see me move, I’m moving in violence.” 

PCC women’s basketball coach John Slaughter, one of the organizers of the ironically named “Don’t Shoot” event,  was also one the men conducting the pre-march instructions before the march and rally.

Holding his toddler, Slaughter urged the crowd to get out of the way if they couldn’t hurt cops and let others do it for them. He yelled so fiercely to the gathered (mostly white) crowd that his toddler started crying.

During the protest-march, Strickland was roughed up by a cell of Antifa protesters led by Ben Kerensa, the hefty 300 400 pound computer hacker, bomb hoaxer and professional protester.

Kerensa is a multiple federal and state felon who’s done time in the penitentiary.

Other thugs used their black bloc flag staffs to hit Strickland.  Kerensa admitted later in court that he struck Strickland.

He’s never been brought up on assault charges.

When the same group tried to run Strickland out of the protest by coming at him again, he asked the crowd to stay back, as he backed away.

As they continued advancing, Strickland grabbed his  licensed Glock pistol and ordered them to stay away from him as he continued to back away from the crowd. His finger was never on the trigger.

Shareef also menaced Strickland as he backed away from his attackers and followed him along a downtown Portland street.

But it was Strickland who was arrested and charged with two misdemeanors, ticketed, and told to show up the next day in court.

The next day, the prosecutor Katharine “Kate” Molina, presented hearsay testimony and lies to increase Strickland’s charges and his bail.

As Strickland points out in his video below, Molina used a false police report to tie him to alleged threats suffered by protester none other than John Slaughter at an event the month before.

Here is what she represented to a judge:

“I’ve had a chance to review other reports, um, one specifically addressing addressing an incident on June 12th of this year, uh, where, uh attendees were going to a candlelight vigil in honor of the victims of the Orlando, um, nightclub shooting, and that Mr. Strickland was present and was, um, disrupting the vigil by taking videotape of the protest..er excuse me, the attendees who were there.

Um, when one of the attendees, um, asked Mr. Strickland um, to leave, um, there was, um, some sort of exchange, I believe, and, within a day or so, that attendee started receiving numerous phone calls and text messages on a daily basis that were of a threatening and on a race based nature, um, and based on that attendees information about Mr. Strickland, whom he believes identifies himself as a white nationalist-anarchist, um, believed that Mr. Strickland was behind and orchestrating those threatening text messages and phone calls.

So based on that prior conduct that the state is aware of, um, based on reports reviewed, as well as the nature of the current offense, um, given the reason for the protest last night, the state has serious concerns about, um, Mr. Strickland, um being out in the community without supervision at this time. So the state is asking that he be taken back into custody and that bail be increased to $250,000. I’m also asking for a release decision (?) [unintelligible] evaluation only under the condition of no weapon, no ammunition and strict compliance.”

Look at Molina’s statement that I transcribed from Strickland’s video (see it below). Note the information she presents to the judge as true  and consider the language she used as her “evidence”:

“that attendee started receiving numerous phone calls and text messages on a daily basis  …  were of a threatening and … race based nature,”

The “attendee,” Slaughter, began getting calls and texts. That’s because the “attendee” insisted Strickland use his phone number in his video. In a video showing Slaughter approving of the violent anti-police rhetoric and pro gun speech at the anti gun event a month earlier, he also offered to give protesters his phone number. Apparently, this is part of his schtick.

Strickland displayed the number in the Orlando vigil video.

I don’t think Strickland should have included Slaughter’s phone number in the video, but that’s really not the point here.

The salient points are:

  1. Were there any calls?
  2. How many?
  3. Who called him?
  4. Where’s the call log of who called him?
  5. Where is the evidence of those voice mails and or text messages which “were frequent”and allegedly racist?
  6. Where’s the evidence that Strickland “orchestrated them”?
  7. Where’s the evidence of any “threats” received whatsoever?

Nowhere, that’s where.

Surely, a deputy DA testifying before a judge should weigh actual evidence before depriving a person of their liberty. But that didn’t happen here.

Slaughter held himself out as a leader of Black Lives Matter and Don’t Shoot Portland. Surely, he’d be savvy enough to save ‘evidence’ of someone sending racist and threatening messages. Call logs on cell phones and network phone systems at a government agency such as PCC would certainly retain information. It had only been one month since this supposedly horrible thing had happened to Slaughter by a man “whom he believes identifies himself  is a white nationalist anarchist.”

Well, if you’re a professional BLM and anti gun protester such as John Slaughter, this should be public relations GOLD!

You’re the leader of your group and your allies are  Black Panthers (black nationalists)  AND YOU’VE FOUND A REAL LIVE WHITE NATIONALIST!! Send out the press release!

But he didn’t, of course, because he knew Strickland wasn’t a racist.

Worse, she assumed his assumptions that Strickland “identifies himself as a white nationalist anarchist” were true. Is  “whom he believes identifies himself” the standard of proof now?

And what the heck is a “white nationalist anarchist” anyway? Let’s ask John Slaughter. He apparently is the only one who does.

What he did do was file a phony police report that Strickland never heard about until Molina used it to increase the charges and the bail.

In short, a prosecutor’s reckless assumption based on phony and outrageous assumptions by Slaughter meant 21 charges and a $250,000 fine and thousands upon thousands of dollars in legal fees for Mike Strickland.

As for the “white nationalist” clap trap, as we’ve seen over and over and over again during the Antifa, black bloc anarchist, professional protester events, if you disagree with them you’re automatically labeled a racist.  Antifa must debase their opponents and ascribe every sordid misdeed to them in order to puff themselves up to signal to others that their anti free speech violence is somehow ‘noble.’

Worse, he could have been sent to prison for 50 years on all the felony charges. As it was, he was deprived of his liberty for 40 days. It’s an outrage.

As Strickland points out in his video, he lost his liberty over a false police report. If it can happen to him it can happen to you.

Strickland Self Defense: Will #PDX Media Change False Narrative on Gun Case?

Since the Black Lives Matter protest in which citizen journalist Mike Strickland drew a pistol on protesters  “bee lining” for him, the Portland media has done everything it can to depict him as something he’s not.

Strickland was freed on $250,000 bail one day before a bail review hearing last week.

Willamette Week insists on called him a “counter protester.” The respected weekly rag has made up this characterization out of whole cloth.  On what is this based, exactly? No idea.

Image Credit: Screenshot/Willamette Week
Photo Credit: Screenshot/Willamette Week

Strickland has been on the scene for years now as a citizen journalist. He will goad people into giving him a comment, but that doesn’t make him anymore a “counter protester” than George Stephanopolous is when he goads politicos with whom he disagrees to answer questions.

Photo Credit: Screenshot/YouTube
Photo Credit: Screenshot/YouTube

Worse, both local alternative papers, WW and “The Portland Mercury” have depicted Strickland — a legal gun owner — as some sort of nut because he drew his weapon in self defense.

Image Credit: Screenshot/YouTube
Photo Credit: Screenshot/YouTube

Lefty videographer Mike Bluehair notes that the alternative media are trying to force this narrative with their own news boxes. He sent this video to me last week to make the point:

The Oregonian tried to make an issue out of Strickland carrying ammo for his pistol:

Image Credit: Screenshot/The Oregonian
Photo Credit: Screenshot/The Oregonian

What, exactly, is the correct amount of ammo to carry, Oregonian? One magazine, two, six? And, as long as we’re on that, please define “extended clip” and prove Strickland had one.

“Strickland had an extended clip in what appeared to be a Glock 26 that he swept at chest level multiple times in front of protesters and a plain-clothed Portland police officer, the prosecutor said.”

Photo Credit: Screenshot/YouTube
Photo Credit: Screenshot/YouTube

Where is the “extended clip”? The world awaits your answer, media.

Of course, the mainstream news outlets find the delicious irony in a person pulling a gun at the BLM protest, locally called “Don’t Shoot PDX.”

I’ll tell you what irony is. Irony is at a so-called ‘peaceful’ protest the New Black Panthers held a pre-rally pep talk calling for violence:

I’ll tell you what irony is. Irony is that at a supposedly ‘peaceful’ protest, protesters intentionally assaulted Strickland. Where’s that cutline in the media coverage?

The media swallowed whole the story from a protester who said Strickland tried to “incite or instigate others” at the protest he was covering — when it was they who assaulted Strickland, frightening him so much that he was compelled to pull his pistol in self defense. Now, that’s irony.

The media certainly have their preconceived — and wrong — narrative that they’re wedded to. The real question is, when confronted over and over with the truth of this case, will they bother to inform the public or will they stick with their false narrative?

See my previous posts:

Here’s What 4 Cops & a 2-A Activist Saw When They Watched ‘Man Pulls Gun on PDX Protesters’ Video

Protester Going After Mike Strickland Was “Black Panther” Calling for Violence & Gun Play Before #BLM March

Strickland Isn’t the Only Reporter Threatened & Assaulted by Black Lives Matter Protesters

Citizen Journalist James O’Keefe Spotlights Mike Strickland Case

Portland Citizen Journalist Banned From Portland Campuses That Frequently Welcomed Radicals & Even Domestic Terrorists

The Exoneration of Portland Citizen Journalist Mike Strickland, ‘Laughing at Liberals.’

“Self Defense”: Lefty Videographer at BLM Protest Told Cops Twice That PDX Reporter Mike Strickland Drew Gun In Self Defense