Former ACLU Leader Arrested on Kiddie Porn Charges: Wonders What He Did Wrong

Share with: Everybody. Sharing is caring, ya know.



There ARE sickos everywhere, in every walk of life. Let’s just stipulate that now. The ironic themes about this ACLU official defending the use of NO filters in libraries, that in libraries there were only responsible adults using the computers and not vulnerable kids using the libraries begs further comment. Now we find out that he’s not a responsible adult and it’s okay to rape innocent prepubescent girls. See story here.

Feb. 23, 2007— Federal agents arrested Charles Rust-Tierney, the former president of the Virginia chapter of the ACLU, Friday in Arlington for allegedly possessing child pornography.

Rust-Tierney admitted to investigators that he had downloaded videos and images from child pornography websites onto CD-ROMs, according to the complaint.

The videos described in the complaint depict graphic forcible intercourse with prepubescent females. One if the girls is described in court documents as being “seen and heard crying”, another is described as being “bound by rope.”

Rust Tierney coaches various youth sports teams in and around Arlington, Virginia, according to court documents.

In the past, Rust-Tierney had argued against restricting Internet access in public libraries in Virginia, writing, “Recognizing that individuals will continue to behave responsibly and appropriately while in the library, the default should be maximum, unrestricted access to the valuable resources of the Internet.”


(While this story is sickening and shows premeditation, it’s still not as bad as the recent story of a US soldier raping a 14 year old girl and killing her family. He’s going to prison for 100 years. Wonder what this twinkle toes at the ACLU will get for kiddie porn?)

Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://www.victoriataft.com

Share with: Everybody. Sharing is caring, ya know.


12 thoughts on “Former ACLU Leader Arrested on Kiddie Porn Charges: Wonders What He Did Wrong

  1. This creep will likely blame President Bush, the right-wing talk show hosts, the conservative Christians, and just about anyone else he can think of.

    As for what he gets for punishment, that will probably be 10 days (or hours, or minutes)of community service, a more-or-less severe talking to by some left-wing screwball judge, probably from Vermont, then turned loose to wreak havoc on more little kids.

  2. Typical approach to carpet-bombing with propaganda.

    ACLU guy arrest for child porn.
    ACLU more likely to be liberal.
    Liberal more likely to be Democrat.
    Therefore, Democrats are child pornographers.

    When will these attacks stop?

    It’s childish and they make you look foolish, Victoria.

    That said, I am not in the ACLU, and I do not agree with everything they promote.

    But your tactics and motivations are transparent at best, and you continue to stoop lower and lower to prove whatever “point” you think you’re making.

    That’s you’re, as in “you are”, Klatu. Write it down and learn how to use it.

  3. ican’tspellcauseiwenttopublicschool said: ACLU guy arrest for child porn.
    ACLU more likely to be liberal.
    Liberal more likely to be Democrat.

    Klatu said: I agree

    Ps: spellcheck can you email all of your buddies in the Socialist media and Hollywood, AND TELL THEM about this story. They don’t seem to know about this “ARREST”.If it
    wasn’t for Talk Radio “VICTORIA”
    and FOXNEWS CH. a person wouldn’t
    know about this ARREST.

    pps: I beleive the Socialists like
    “NAMBLA”

  4. How so?

    My post was not in support this person from the ACLU. In fact, it was barely about that case at all – though, for the record, I find the behavior of anyone involved with such activities to be absolutely despicable.

    My post was about Victoria’s attempt to paint the entirety of the left, as she usually does, based upon the actions of one person who is associated with an organization she doesn’t like.

    Maybe I should condemn all Christians and Catholics, and therefore the conservative right with whom they are so closely related, because some priests and televangelists also molested children. Would that be OK with you?

  5. So many accusations.

    iknow,
    I saw nothing in Victoria’s post which indicated that Democrats (or liberals or leftists) are more likely to engage in child porn (either creating or viewing). In fact I thought she clearly stated that it crosses all walks of life.

    scottie,
    I saw nothing in iknow’s posting indicating he (or she) is an advocate of child porn, or any other type of porn.

    Purchasing child porn correlates with creating child porn; in much the same way paying someone to commit murder correlates with committing the murder.
    What is the max/min penalty for purchasing child porn?

    I realize that not all porn exploits children or exploits anyone. I am sure there are some cases where the people doing it are well paid well treated employees.

    The way the industry pushes the product in our faces (and at our children) is harmful. Those who do not go looking for the product are often invaded with attempts by the industry to get them to look at it.

    If you have kids who use myspace, you might want to take a serious look at the so called “dating service” advertising. They are not all the same. One in particular is very close to porn (soft porn), and I am certain the goal is to arouse young men, and get them to click for more. When you are looking at the myspace advertising, make sure you do this while using a profile set as male (if you have teenage boys) and as female (if you have teenage girls) and exercise the full available functionality. It isn’t usually that bad, and I feel almost like a prude pointing it out as a problem. But some nights it is very borderline.

  6. iknowhowtospell said… Maybe I should condemn all Christians and Catholics, and therefore the conservative right with whom they are so closely related, because some priests and televangelists also molested children. Would that be OK with you?

    Klatu said: Catholics and the Consevative Right?? Most Catholics I know are on the Socialist Left.
    And are you hinting at this TED HAGGARD guy in Colorado, whom I had never even heard of till the Socialist Liberal Media exposed him. And I beleive Haggard had relations with grown men. But I don’t think he was a lawyer for the ACLU defending Child Porn at Public Libraries, while buying KIDDIE PORN.

  7. It sure looked to me like he was defending either child porn or its advocates. But maybe I was wrong. But I will take my lumps from the like of r=bs and coboble because they really seem to like going off on someone who does not agree with them down to the letter.

  8. Glad to see I’m included in threads I’ve not commented on or delivered “lumps” in. Must mean I’ve reached some new status level…(eyes rolling).

    If you have a personal beef with me, feel free to email me – requalsbs@gmail.com. I’m more than happy to engage in conversation outside of Victoria’s personal blog.

  9. Scottie,
    What is your definition of “going off on someone”.
    I do tend to defend people when I think someone else has mis-stated their position.
    I tend to do this for views on multiple sides of any issue.
    It really doesn’t have to do as much with disagreeing with me, as it does with slamming someone and claiming they stated something they didn’t state.

    But do I care what you think? I did for a minute, but I am over it.
    (In fact I had to delete what I first typed in, or the blog administrator would have deleted my post, which she may do anyway, and she can, I care not).

    Thank you for grouping me with the likes of r=bs, I consider that a compliment.

Comments are closed.