tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16945570.post113043211799891178..comments2008-08-30T03:30:43.149-07:00Victoria Tafthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15566635810544426855noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16945570.post-1130510399327790162005-10-28T07:39:00.000-07:002005-10-28T07:39:00.000-07:002005-10-28T07:39:00.000-07:00

CT said:"I believe the best thing we can do is begin to recall these activist judges, whose decisions to throw out any political initiative they disagree with is patently transparent."A hypothetical question:What if the roles were reversed, and the "conservative" judges were "overriding" initiatives from the left? Would this also be "activism" from the bench, or would it be "patriotism" as folks

Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16945570.post-1130464856076484032005-10-27T19:00:00.000-07:002005-10-27T19:00:00.000-07:002005-10-27T19:00:00.000-07:00

Jack Roberts is right -- we shouldn't seek to recall judges just because we don't like how they ruled on a constitutional matter. That never wins the argument regarding the issue.Bob T

Bob Tiernannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16945570.post-1130456012241983622005-10-27T16:33:00.000-07:002005-10-27T16:33:00.000-07:002005-10-27T16:33:00.000-07:00

Consider: Oregon is regarded by the Left as one of the most progressive states. Yet this is the same state where its largest city has regularly held votes that rejected light rail, only to be reversed by its leftwing pols. On initiatives, most originating from the center-right, despite passage, they are regularly rejected by an entrenched and corrupt Oregon Judiciary.It seesm the only thing

CTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16945570.post-1130455771804191302005-10-27T16:29:00.000-07:002005-10-27T16:29:00.000-07:002005-10-27T16:29:00.000-07:00

I believe the best thing we can do is begin to recall these activist judges, whose decisions to throw out any political initiative they disagree with is patently transparent. We have had plenty of years to see how it works.

CTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16945570.post-1130443175564819472005-10-27T12:59:00.000-07:002005-10-27T12:59:00.000-07:002005-10-27T12:59:00.000-07:00

Let us all remember this 'bout Jack Roberts;Roberts signed a letter with Dr. No, aka John Kizhaber, opposing the Measure 8 spending limit several years ago.Roberts blunder cost him the Republican nomination for Gov.Roberts should have kept his Pen dry then and his Blog piece here silent.Jack, you just don't know when to keep quiet.No support here for Roberts 4 Supreme, sorry.

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com