More waves. The D's really don't like this much. Dave Reinhard of the Zero does:
KPAM radio's Victoria Taft is even leading a "Dummocrat for a Day" effort pegged to -- you guessed? -- April Fools' Day. She's urging these new Democrats to vote for Clinton to keep the Democratic mess going. "Dummocrats for a Day" is a bit cold, but the idea is appealing. My problem is twofold:
One, is this ethical? Is it fair to play in the other party's sandbox and help pick their nominee? Answer: This is politics. What's ethics got to do with it? When is it unethical to act in the best interest of the nation?
Two, what presidential candidate should a new "Democrat for a Day" vote for? Neither the choice nor the criterion to base a choice on is clear. Should we vote for the D who would make the best president? Or should we vote strategically -- for one whose win would prolong our new party's nomination battle or one who would be easiest for Republicans to beat?
17 comments:
"Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole. Fascists seek to forge a type of national unity, usually based on (but not limited to) ethnic, cultural, racial, religious attributes. Various scholars attribute different characteristics to fascism, but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: patriotism, nationalism, statism, militarism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, corporatism, populism, collectivism, autocracy and opposition to political and economic liberalism"
Victoria: Since Scott "keith" Moore of the SOS office seems to be Blogging here. Maybe we can get a Daily play by play from him about how the State Wide Dem Registration is doing.
Ps: you did see the Boston Globe article about "OPERATION CHAOS" didn't you?
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/03/17/many_voting_for_clinton_to_boost_gop/
Klatu,
How do you know scott moore is keith moore. Scott has been on this blog before, no doubt, but how do you figure Keith is Scott?
Victoria: I'm 99.99% sure Scott Moore and Keith Moore are the same Person. Keith Moore posts start with the Rainbow Picture of your dads and end last night. I thought I'd compare old Willmette Weak editorials of Scott Moore with Post's by Keith Moore. Keith Moore even seemed abit like he was a Moderate to conservative in most of his posts for a while but there was little things that just didn't add up as a conservative. I'm sorry if I went Baserk but I've never been called "Klaturd" by someone on the RIGHT (other than a RINO)before and he got kinda Buddy Buddy with IKNOW. THIS IS WHERE THE ALARM BELLS ReallY WENT OFF FOR ME. Do A google on Scott Moore and read his articles yourself. You might agree with me.
Also your paragraph Victoria that read: I think it's apropos that former Mercury bad boy, Scott Moore, is Bill Bradbury's spokesman now (and has been for a few months). This is what got me comparing articles and Keith Moore Posts plus this Keith Moore Line that read(At what point did a halfway intelligent right-winger say that Barrack Obama is Muslim).
This Line from Keith Moore is exactly when I went to Google searching for Scott Moore Articles I think this guy was trying to appear as a conservative before this and he tripped himself up.
This operation Chaos is a perfect reason for Democrat SOS to eves drop even infiltrate alot on shows like yours Victoria. The Dems are in Chaos and Nervous.
Ps: I do agree with Iknow on one thing, IF HE IS SCOTT MOORE why was he stupid enough to use his last name "MOORE" and pretend he's some one else.
State law should be checked on this. I could be wrong, But
HEY SCOTT "KEITH" MOORE where are ya?
Keith Moore said...
Yeah, it's sort of fun to see him rant... I believe the poor fellow might be genuinely retarded.
You know, iknowhowtospell, I think it's wonderful to have Klaturd among us. Where else would we get such a sterling example of inbreeding?
On a more serious note, Jonny, the antiwar movement seems to operate with a different tenor than the highly principled stances on war taken by people like the Amish who wholly reject the notion that they should be called upon to kill their fellow men. Time after time, no matter who organizes it or participates in it, I don't see any examples of mass marches that are peaceful and dignified; rather, they seem to attract various human flotsam and jetsam whose idea of a principled argument roughly parallels the intellectual firepower of Klatu. THAT is why I have trouble attributing any virtuous motives to them.
18 March, 2008 01:33
Klatu said...
Scott Moore: your boss pictured to the right there is probably
wondering why your
posting under another name.
Ps: Scott Moore are ya going
back to Willamette Weak
After the SOS job you have
now goes to the Republicans
in 2009?
PPs: Why don't you post under
your real name SCOTT MOORE?
ARN'T YOU IN SOME VIOLATION
OF STATE LAW SCOTT?
18 March, 2008 02:23
Ps: I copied these two posts here, one of Scott Keith Moore and My Reply so they would be easily seen. They were at Democrat Dumocrat for a day making waves.
Klatu
I still find it hilarious that the democrats are crying about this idea. All kinds of funny letters to the editor in the Oregonian crying about it.
Then people like Jonny make me laugh comparing being a republican to a fascism... God I needed a good laugh today.
Jonny.. under the that definition the Democrats have nothing to worry about. Because they do the very same thing.. only in the name of their platform.
Actually I was NOT comparng republicans to fascism. Abraham Lincoln was a Republican whom I greatly admire. Some "republican" ideology has been corrupted into fascism (see Bush and Co; Patriot Act etc. And Victorias little plan to foul an election through INCINSERE voting smacks of it.
Most good natured Rebublicans are rejecting her (Rush's) little plan for that very reason.
Klatu, "your" little comment about Amish and Flotsam and Jetsom" was a cut paste of Keith Moores comment elsewhere. And I responded to him on that already on that post. Why would you do that? Trying to appear smarter than you really are- eh?
Did they teach you to read English in Government Schools Jonny?
Read the very last Paragraph of my Post. The answer is there.
You are clearly a conspiracy theorist.
But I digress, I still have a couple of questions for you:
1. What is the definition of socialism (in your own words; done correctly)
2. If John Mccain were to lose the general election who would you rather have as president: Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama?
jonny sorry to tell ya:
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows John McCain continuing to hold a six-percentage point lead over both potential Democratic opponents. McCain currently leads Barack Obama 48% to 42% and Hillary Clinton 49% to 43% margin (see recent daily results). New polling released today shows McCain and Obama tied in Colorado and McCain with a three-point advantage in New Hampshire.
But thats my point. Its too close to call. And the general election hasn't even begun. Soo the question still stands.
CNN Poll from 03/18/08: McCain, Obama, Clinton In Dead Heat
Politics – If Obama were to win the nomination, he would get 47 percent of the vote compared to 46 percent for McCain -- a statistical tie given the poll's 3 percentage point margin of error. Should Clinton win the nomination, the poll suggests she would get 49 percent compared to McCain's 47 percent -- another statistical tie.
The above is a quote. Dif. Polls will get dif. results when its this close.
Now, Klatu, given these facts it is reasonable to ask yourself which Dem you would rather have in the white house.
Who is it?
Thursday, March 20, 2008
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows John McCain’s lead growing against both potential Democratic opponents. McCain currently leads Barack Obama 49% to 42% and Hillary Clinton 51% to 41% margin (see recent daily results). African-American support for Clinton has collapsed, falling to 55% in the general election match-up. Obama, on the other hand, earns solid support from African-American voters but attracts only 36% of white voters in a match-up with McCain.
Ps: Sane People stopped looking at anything CNN-DNC along time ago
Thats not an answer, Klatu.
Post a Comment