Daily Archives: February 13, 2008

Cannon Beach Council Votes to Impeach President Bush and Vice President Cheney. I Vote We Don’t Give Any Money to Cannon Beach.

The story is here.
The resolution passed 3-2; council president Jay Raskin, council member Jerome Arnold and council member Sam Steidel voted to pass the resolution while Mayor John Williams and council member Nancy Giasson voted against.

CANNON BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PHONE NUMBER IS:
(503) 436-2623 x3.
EMAIL HERE.

The Dorchester Conference is heading out to Seaside in late Feb and early March. I would advise all of those folks to refrain from spending any money in Cannon Beach during that or any other time for that matter. Shame on them.

Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://www.victoriataft.com

Biz Journal Poll

SURVEY QUESTION:

What kind of influence does political talk radio have on you? Go here.

It’s impossible to scan radio stations without coming across political talk radio, both national and local — conservative, liberal and all points in-between. Many hosts even take credit for influencing policy decisions.

What kind of influence does political talk radio have on you?
A great source of information It’s entertaining, but I don’t take it seriously
I passively listen sometimes Are you kidding? I can’t stand it
Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://www.victoriataft.com

From Global Test to Global Tax: Obama GLOBAL TAX on Docket for Thursday. CALL YOUR SENATORS AND SAY ‘NO’


The United States is tops in giving to the world’s downtrodden. Under this kooky plan proposed by Barrack Obama (he must be so proud; what is this, his FIRST piece of legislation or something?) the United States would be on the hook to spend .7 of GDP on poverty programs around the world. That would result in spending $845 billion MORE than the US already spends over a 13 year period.
Move on dot commies just don’t get it: When the government takes over the role of the individual individuals don’t feel impelled to act.
That means that this would undoubtedly have the net effect of REDUCING the US contributions to the rest of the world. Why? As I stated above, when the government takes over something people figure it’s the government’s job so, ‘Why should I do it?’
Also, the obvious thing is if Barrack Obama really wants to encourage anti poverty programs he’d be a huge backer of capitalism and encourage business growth in those areas of the world where people could do for themselves with some capital backing.
More here.

Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://www.victoriataft.com

From Global Test to Global Tax: Obama GLOBAL TAX on Docket for Thursday. CALL YOUR SENATORS AND SAY ‘NO’


The United States is tops in giving to the world’s downtrodden. Under this kooky plan proposed by Barrack Obama (he must be so proud; what is this, his FIRST piece of legislation or something?) the United States would be on the hook to spend .7 of GDP on poverty programs around the world. That would result in spending $845 billion MORE than the US already spends over a 13 year period.
Move on dot commies just don’t get it: When the government takes over the role of the individual individuals don’t feel impelled to act.
That means that this would undoubtedly have the net effect of REDUCING the US contributions to the rest of the world. Why? As I stated above, when the government takes over something people figure it’s the government’s job so, ‘Why should I do it?’
Also, the obvious thing is if Barrack Obama really wants to encourage anti poverty programs he’d be a huge backer of capitalism and encourage business growth in those areas of the world where people could do for themselves with some capital backing.
More here.

Tell ’em where you saw it. Http://www.victoriataft.com