Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Will Washington Sacrifice Humans for Fish Following Chehalis/Centralia Flooding?

It's dry now and the stores are reopened, but when the time comes to solve the Chehalis River flooding problem will the state choose fish over people? Will the state allow damming and dredging or will they, as Congressman Brian Baird has suggested, expect blow back from enviros?
Can they both coexist? Watch what happens now. The Victoria Taft Show is in Chehalis and Centralia today on KPAM 860 where we'll talk to the locals about how this fight is already starting.
This amazing image, by the way, is from the Seattle PI.

2 comments:

Eileen (aka Coboble) said...

.
.
.
Is it Humans versus Fish, or Today's Humans versus the Humans of the Future?

Does Sacrifice Humans mean that some Humans (who built in a flood zone) loose something Economically so fish can survive to produce future generations needed for an eco system.

Or do some humans have to die so fish can live?

Scottiebill said...

Eileen is right - humans will have to die so the fish can live. This is the b.s. mantra that the enviro-wackos will be preaching in regards to the Chehalis River dredging idea. After all, they have been preaching the same b.s. concerning the dams on the Snake River and the Columbia River for a long time. And there are some dips--t judges that are going along with them, not to mention our faux governess, Chrissy Gregoire, who was elected by a bunch of dead voters in King County 3 years ago, and Teddy the Useless in Oregon. He is ignoring the people of Oregon and the myriad of problems in that state to rush off to Iowa to genuflect at the feet of Hillary. One has to wonder if Teddy the Useless will wash her feet while he is lying prone at them.

Back to the fish: Fish were on this planet long before humans were and they will still be here long after we are gone. Don't look for any dredging of any river while Chrissy the Fake and Teddy the Useless are governors.