Like what Eason Jor
dan is doing with coverage in Iraq, right? Oregon's only Republican Senator, Gordon Smith, as you know, comes out to pillory the President on Iraq policy and now it's believed he was doing the President a favor? He must be working toward the Lincoln Chafee hall of fame honors.
Smith goes to duh.com for these gems, such as it's a bad thing when US soldiers are killed. Getting blown up by these IED things is bad. Oh, and, because of those things, the President's plan is immoral. Maybe he's been taking lessons from the new House Intelligence Committee head, Sylvestre Reyes.
I've seen at least two of Gordon's TV appearances since he went before the empty Senate and made his TV speech which his team sent straightaway to the media and he says the same thing over and over. He says these things at a time when the President is already planning to make changes in strategy. But the biggest thing in Gordon's mind is: 2008 when he's up for re election.
I will agree with him on the need for more troops and I only THINK that's what he wants because he continues to be unclear in what he wants the President to do. Here's his original comment:
"I, for one, am at the end of my rope when it comes to supporting a policy that has our soldiers patrolling the same streets in the same way being blown up by the same bombs day after day. That is absurd... But, we have no business being a policeman in someone else's civil war. So I welcome the Iraq study group but I'd rather do it quicker rather than later. Whatever it is, it will not be pretty. I am looking for answers but the current course is unacceptable to this U.S. Senator.... I'm afraid rather than leveling with the American people saying this was going to be a decade-long conflict because of the ancient hatreds that exist in that part of the world, that we tried to win with too few troops in too fast a time.let us fight the war on terror more intelligently than we have, because we have fought this war in a very lamentable way. I would have never voted for this conflict had I reason to believe that the intelligence we had was not accurate. It was not accurate, but that is history. Now we must find a way to make the best of a terrible situation at a minimum of loss of life for our brave fighting men and women."
Been there done that. No. No. NO and no. Gordon won't come on the show. Amazing. We started calling at 6:55 pm last Thursday.
Here's the link to Dave's piece in the O.
PS Gordon I told you the Democrats won't vote for you just because you triangulate your position. Here's the latest cartoon from Blue Oregon.

7 comments:
VT,
In total agreement with you as you may see
in the award given Gordon
Reinhard is scary (Rino-ish) at times - too many times for my liking.
RW
I like David's take on this, finally someone who agrees with me (Usually I am out in a zone all my own.)
It is not the right or left that eventually determines who wins the elections anyway. It is the center. But first he has to win the primary, and that is why any theory he was trying to get the democratic vote made no sense to me.
Why should Gordon come on your show? Would you even give him a fair shake, or is your mind already made up (as it was with Randy).
I've been asking since I started talking about this last Thursday(?) night for Gordon to come on the show.
He should come because you ask?
hmmm, what a concept.
I am sure he is a very busy man with lots of requests for his time.
But if he does come, I think you should treat him better than you did either Matt or Randy, and actually listen to him without having already made up your mind as the value of his ideas.
He doesn't have to come on. I think it's probably a good idea for him to speak to his constituency occasionally, however, even if it's on a 'broad'cast to a wide spectrum of his constituents. Still, he might feel more comfortable talking to the Oregonian or Randi Rhodes. I could see why.
I see no reason politicians, any of them, can't face hard questions. Soft ball questions just let them give pre-prepared answers and doesn't let the voting public see what they really stand for.
Of course, outright rudeness shouldn't be allowed, but neither should they be coddled.
He should do something, like maybe an interview where all the Oregon talk show hosts get to ask him questions (a news conference sort of thing), so he doesn't have to take the time to go on each show.
I could send him an email and ask him. (I am important enough that this would make a difference, not).
I trust a politician that breaks from the party line to speak his mind, more than one which is a blind follower.
Post a Comment